open letter to unesco

A L'UNESCO:

Chere Monsieur, Chère Madame:

Dès les actualités sur une réception par UNESCO de l'autorité palestinienne, je suis agacé, par exemple, par l'usage du français par les terroristes y présents en proférant des paroles sur une résistance contre l'agenda des Occidentaux présents.  En plus, la cause des palestiniens ne fait guère un appel qu'aux nations non - alignées à l'usage des bureaux UNESCO.  Ceci soit depuis longtemps connu, et aussi dont les actions anti - Européens des pays non - alignés, surtout eux à l'intention anti - Français, et d'auprès mon point de vue privé tout à fait contre les bons intentions politiques et administratives d'autres pays, les EE.UU. inclus. 

Au moment où j'étais à Paris pour mes études (années 1980,) et depuis, j'ai rencontré un nombre de palestiniens qui partagent l'attitude illégal à chercher des conflits contre l'Israél et par contre à promouvoir un dominance et influence arabes et de leur livre, le Quran, dans le monde.  Desormais l'époque de mes études en France, si je me rappelle bien, l'UNESCO ait été vandalisée (en attentat) au moins en partie par les palestiniens et fût fermée pour un temps.  Pourquoi donc cette admission aux bureaux de l'ONU?  Les idées à promouvoir (encore) et à réaliser ce "laisser - entrer" sont basées sure des principes trompeuses d'une métaphysique dépassée de la deuxième guerre mondiale contre la croyance hébraïque et le christianisme.  Etape par étape, la métaphysique de la lutte contre l'Israél et son peuple, au cours du XXème siècle, ait gagné une primauté sur la scène mondiale sur une grande échelle plus d'une seule fois, et au résultat d'un coût de millions de vies, de gaspillage et déstruction inouïes.  Qu'est - ce que nous demandons ici, à part d'une état d'esprit pareillement ciblé sur un raisonnement de la réussite des dégâts du siècle passé servant au prologue des conflits à venir.  Sinon des conflits, peut - être un résurgence des esprits et attitudes contre - touts ce que représentent l'Ouest et sa politique de base de la liberté, égalité, fraternité, et surtout contre les israéliens qui seraient réduits encore aux hôtes d'un pays quasi - Libanais. 

A cause en direct de ce processus, et ici donnée la France, pays Européen des réfugiés, on peut prévoir des situations telles que Sangatte, au nord du pays aux années 2000; et ceci pour des milliers de raisons, desquelles une pour chaque individu.  Au niveau personnel, je suis encore choqué par la manque et abandon du porte - parole Européen et Français sur le sujet de l'attitude encore militante des palestiniens, et l'ensemble des pays non - alignés contre une propre gestion et influence partagées par tous contre la violence et terrorisme y encaissées. 

Bien à vous,

THS 

Californie, EE.UU.

Another, belated review of "America and the World," by ...

…  Zbigniew Brzezinski and Brent Scowcroft:

This political book, written with David Ignatius examines current affairs and gives a new detailed synopsis of the role of the U.S. in the world, primarily from the time of the Marshall Plan through the Cold War and related nuclear threats, up to the fall of the former soviet union and then through 9 / 11 and beyond.  The text presents the idea that modern life, especially that in western society is in a new form of complexity not even seen since the fully bureaucratic days of Byzantium, for example.  The book begins with its proposals about historical events and their significance to us at this point (now 2008,) and then moves on to examine various questions, such as the Israelis and Palestinians and their state of affairs vis – a – vis the prosecution of the Iraq war.  With respect to Israel, there are great influences calling for a resolution of the conflict with the Palestinians, even at great sacrifice to the Jews, and this is in part what here is interpreted more and more as a ‘status quo’ to begin resolving this and other Middle East issues.  In fact, to abandon the ideals of an Israeli homeland at this point in time would be to equally abandon important U.S. state policies and roles in associations like the G – 20, N.A.T.O., our positions on nuclear non – proliferation and Eastern Europe, in favour of the polity of states like Iran who essentially exploit anti – Israeli groups like Hezbollah and Hamas.  Some of the text is dedicated to illustrating the last part of the Bush Administration and efforts to resolve the conflicts of Hamas, Beirut, and the role of Syria against the Jews, though this effort was shown as, and in fact was not overridingly successful.

The Taliban are perceived in the theme of this examination of historical events through Brzezinski and Scowcroft as a significant threat to U.S. national security, and as the memorable opponents of the soviets in Afghanistan as well.  One is also reminded the Pakistanis and the Taliban were trained by western military people, again against the soviets and the situation as it is today with the Taliban is extremely rancorous with respect to western governments.  

With respect to economics, though mostly politics in the Far East, the authors illustrate principally the rising power, economic and political, financial and so on, of the P.R.C. in terms of the enlightened self – interest not only of its Asian neighbors, but of western officialdom as well.  The rivalry between the P.R.C. and its Asian contemporaries with the west is nonetheless portrayed as ruthless in economic terms.  The issues of Tibet and T’ai wan, and South Korea are easily interpreted as very tense situations with P.R.C., a communist – party based government still dealing with the legacy of T’ian An Men and Deng Xiao Ping; and the recognitions of the legitimacy of smaller Asian associations such as A.S.E.A.N.  Special mention is made of North Korea and the need for its own adherence to nuclear anti – proliferation rules and other regional security issues including the naval incidents of late.  

Special mention is also made in large part of Russia and its current leadership after the very significant Gorbachev and Yeltsin years:  Apart from the conundrum surrounding the mutual political and administrative status of Dmitri Medvedev and Vladimir Putin, there seem to be four major issues with Russia, and all are unsolvable:  Nuclear non – proliferation, N.A.T.O. and the former soviet and COMECON (and Warsaw Pact) states, the vagaries of the petrol business, and relations with P.R.C.  With respect to Eastern Europe, still, Western Europe is illustrated as at times a fitful ally and then again as a close political and administrative partner that is attempting on the state level to rise above issues of nationalism in its institutions.  It is here where the authors bring in their partitioned time – lines on American politics and the world, dating back to the age of John Quincy Adams, then forward to the Wilson presidency, and then post – 9 / 11 events.  Brzezinski notes at this point the older European community was much more cohesive on a regional level given the two devastating world wars and the Cold War during the 20^th century, and needs at present better political coordination.  With respect to World Wars I and II, N.A.T.O. is still an issue unto itself that affects the sovereignty of most Europeans, regardless of nationality or where they reside in the region.

To begin the conclusion of the text, the authors enter into a discussion about the importance of human dignity and human rights, and its influence on their ideas about doctrinaire enlightened or “guileful” realism in affairs.  There is also some discussion of a new world order in which cultural identities have primacy, hearkening to the world of 20^th century Wilsonian political ideas.  The new administration in Washington, D.C., while it promised a number of important things, especially about changes in government, is seen currently as bogged down in its own efforts, and with respect to foreign policy there has been progress and reform in the integration of departments and agencies as far as communications and functioning are concerned.