von Mises |
Human Action, by Lüdwig von Mises (Yale, 1949.) –
Book Review.
From the sheer weight of the book here, and the fine print,
it is evident and obvious this is a magnum opus by a premier, flagship
economist of the post war Austrian School in his thesis replying to all others. While von Mises is entirely credible today,
even after his passing some time ago, and this in view of the results of
lacunae in other schools, notable among them the theorists, pundits and even
practitioners who just talk about what goes on in money centers. In view of his marked omission in the text of
many marquis administrative topics including things like national banking and
other items examined first in the book, these are described as the well – known
relationship in economic terms between “Peter” and “Paul”. Such books as von Mises thesis here, as they
are construed from the title of the text or the volume of text, issues of
language, terminology and the like are sometimes described as someone’s “theory
of everything”: Human Action is
by no means the hitchhikers’ guide to the galaxy as many economics texts as
well might be said to be, and it stands in wonderful parallels in the States to
the great text on the subject by Paul Samuelson that first appeared during the
1960’s and wonderfully termed itself, Economics. The Samuelson book despite its age as well still
explains for everyone the principles of modern economics in plain and simple
English, and the concepts themselves are extremely powerful and override much
of what we know to be “sociology” and “psychology” and other among the social
sciences then and now. The contrast between
the thesis of von Mises of the 1950’s and Samuelson of the 1960’s to today has
to do with Samuelson’s Hobbesian and overall technical and quantitative approach
to the subject whereas von Mises theoretical computations have to do with
commercial and money – motivated intricacies.
Economics for von Mises was the toil of a liberal psychologist in the
experimental sciences (in fact, the terms here describe what today would be a
kind of quackery but at the time were very seriously done and had great weight,
for example, with the planners of the “Great Society” and so forth) in the
areas of natural and behavioral research, and in the un – scientific realm of
literary psychology (telling people what you knew as much as to not have them
upset at what you say and how you say it).
Economy or economics for von Mises was a behavior, as no doubt he
believed money is a huge influencer of economics and business behavior or “action”. A second principle that runs between the
lines throughout the book after being openly discussed early in the text is an
acknowledgement that inequality and inequalities everywhere call for
interpersonal interaction and social and societal cooperation – it is difficult
given his belief in the heavy influences of capital and this latter observation
as well, to tell if von Mises actually allowed for a socio – economic status
quo or if he was constantly striving to find a way for this experimental
science to break through the barriers of behavior as defined, economic behavior
specifically, to have people find new innovative and inventive ground in many new
ways. It is evident von Mises knew that “a
penny saved is a penny earned” and the like, and perhaps at the exclusion of
other opportunities in life and in business / finance and economics, and with
the emphasis in his book on prices and things like exchange rates and interest,
it might be said he was not ‘miserly’ but might have been against spending
greatly on things; and his levels of analysis indicate he had a liking for most
people, especially the worker and consumer, the family man and homemaker. To mention the spirit of von Mises as today
quite happy with the federalist state of his native Europe – the relative
economic stability and avoidance of poverty, the social stability as well,
indicate the text was read there in a meaningful way without its being a
cookbook for things as some economics text are.
Overall an excellent read.