Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Thursday, June 23, 2011
China's Management Revolution - "Spirit, Land, Energy." - by Charles Edouard Bouee
This text, while it proposes many ideas about how the P.R.C. has succeeded economically over the past thirty years, presumably by studying and adapting western methods to its own ends, does fall short of illustrating substantially any justification about how the free market can be reconciled with a state - run culture and country run by party rules. It also proposes China was substantially unscathed by the latest financial crises; something probably meant to be read by people who are uninformed. The book begins by questioning, in view of the monolithic success of P.R.C. and its command / free market model economy with communism in its foundation and background, what the survivability of the "American" model laissez - faire capitalism in a political environment of liberal democracy could be in view of the newer influences of economic disciplines and public, and political (civic and civil) restrictions such as are now prevalent in P.R.C.
The background of the current economic climes in P.R.C. is illustrated as having its origin in the time of Deng Xiao - ping ("three times up an down") whence the western leaning of many elements in the system of the P.R.C., and principally the return of Hong Kong to China in 1997. Deng was made famous, among other things, by stating "I do not care about the color of the cat, as long as he catches mice!" This imparts the value in current Chinese culture that using utilitarian methods to accomplish commercial goals is a major solution to accomplishments in worldwide competition. The text goes through the various corporate reforms under Deng, including the creation of Special Economic Zones, State and Collectively Owned Enterprises (SOE's and COE's,) and Township and Village Enterprises (TVE's) among others. Said corporate entities were created in order: i. To increase worker productivity, and ii. To attract foreign direct investment, the money of which, incidentally, is probably completely gone at this point. The book also illustrates typical hyper - successful Chinese entrepreneurs within China: Ye Mao zhong, Jian Xi pei, Guo Zhen xi, Zhang Yong, Yuan Ya fei, Feng Jun, Luyang Jiang, Zhong Qing hou, Zhou Hong ji, Zhang Lau and others. These are exclusive of Chinese outside China like the very well - to - do Steven Chen, Jerry Yang, and Andrea Jung (all the business people the author cites are men,) and no mention is made of the overseas Chinese being much more successful financially than their mainland counterparts.
The overall successes economically and socially, and the influence of Chinese society (again) are illustrated as the result of and "environment of evolutionary adaptedness" (Deng) as exemplified in the Bei jing Olympics in 2008 and the latest economics statistics. The business methods in P.R.C. are also presented in the text as currently distancing themselves from strictly utilitarian values to turn their attention to social and commercial / economic inequality, widespread poor business practices, corruption, pollution (especially of the mainland aquifers) and other difficulties that high - level management has currently pledged itself to remedy. The following topics are examined as well and a chapter is dedicated to each: a. "Spirit" - the knowledge of the Ancients and popular culture as applied to current society; b. "Land" - the Chinese approach to territorial geopolitics as administered by the party leadership and the military; c. "Energy" - as illustrated from the hegemonic Mercantilist tradition and capitalism as the game of commercial activities including party leadership, alertness, opportunism, and application of ancient ideas (Daoism, Confucianism, Legalism, and doctrines of Sun Tzu and the like.) Chinese management is illustrated in the end as being autocratic with many redeeming features, of which the characteristics of adaptation, reciprocity, consensus, ...
The author goes so far as to cite and compare Chinese methods with the theories and practices of Frederick Taylor's management style, and the same with those of Alfred Chandler, Ronald Coase and Oliver Williamson as a continuum of ideas leading to Chinese principles at present. Only a few paragraphs are committed to this conclusive prose and the validity of this type of continuity is doubtful and in the reviewer's opinion the current Chinese methods are industrial and technological, scientific and cultural, even agricultural in nature, in the older, twentieth - century sense, without consideration to or any focus on the actual benefit of such business methods and activities in a world of more advanced doctrines and principles, that is the present basis for their corporate forms of business.
THS
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Monday, May 30, 2011
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Saturday, May 7, 2011
a philosophy of terror (and cultural revolution ... ?)
This past week, the leader of Al Q'aida as Osama (Oussama, etc.) bin Laden, was executed by American commandos who were able to find his hiding place near a major Pakistani military base and academy. Many questions arise as to the way in which Mr. bin Laden was able to stay in his current surroundings for so long, apparently more than a year before his death, amidst so many of his adversaries occupying the neighboring Islamabad base. There does not seem to be a ready explanation, although it is possible he was good at the kind of cloak and dagger, and other mysteries of character some people have to avoid captivity and execution, at least for as long as he did. That this man is dead is no tragedy for the great powers and for the rest of the world that fears international terror and mayhem. Bin Laden was an unrepentant and uncontrolled animal who sought the destruction probably of most things Western and those in particular that pained his eyes or his whim about western culture and its attempts to absorb and reconcile the long - standing tendencies and abuses of oriental culture that are so rife, but that are so little spoken, much less written about, even in this time of prolific press reports and the clamoring for transparency of political ideas be they of the majority or the opposition in many systems.
That bin Laden was a Saudi Arabian citizen, and that he met his end as he did obviously gives great pain to his following, but it might also be painful for spectators and onlookers to see how the sword of Damocles fell on this person, and probably definitively as well on his terrorist organisation: There are paradoxes to the death of any major terrorist - criminal (i.e., Abu Nidal,) and the overall philosophy of death around Al Q'aida, and if they have not already been defined in talks with, for instance, Fouad Ajami and Abbas Milani, they need to be examined before the public eye and disseminated as simply as possible in order that there be no resurgence of this culture or philosophy of terror, violence and death as originating in the Afghani countryside during soviet times. There is a political argument, tangibly marxist, that the Taliban were left to be victimised by everybody once the soviets left Afghanistan and their American security forces allies had left the country as well. It was probably that after the reign of Babrak Karmel ended, that many Afghanis, in fact many people in the region overall did believe the Americans would start arriving in their C - 5A transports with money and gifts for the Taliban (every single one) once the soviets had left in 1979. Unfortunately, this view proved to be on the level of fantasy as the Americans wanted the Taliban to try to build up their own country in their own way, and as most countries had done since the beginning of the industrial revolution in the late 1800's. Also unfortunately, the Taliban apparently believed their allying with the American security forces during the conflict with the soviets would provoke or invite this promise from either the Carter or subsequent Reagan administrations. When these dreams for them went unfulfilled, they used their turncoat behaviour over time as a type of blackmail, not that they were in the least guided by Islamic ideas and theology, but the Taliban and some of the mujadheen and other islamists figured they could extort political currency by using bin Laden's treasury (and other moneys of other less wealth people) to become like a super - charged Hezbollah. The Taliban has had their own kind of Islam that is quite orthodox and includes anyone as their enemy, not just as targeting Israel and the Hebrew tribes, but anyone who engaged them in any sort of confrontation, apparently even adversarial verbal exchanges or simple arguments. Bin Laden's method was to use what is essentially believed to be family wealth to raise an army and the funds to corrupt and destroy through terror as many of his western adversaries as possible, regardless of their mutual alliances or confluence of goals in reviewing the situation of islamists in the world, and regardless of their accommodation(s) to him, or any convergence of ideas they shared or would share.
It is well - known that Saudi people are wonderful people. In many ways, the Saudis have been better to Americans than, for example, other countries of the Western Hemisphere, without naming in particular any citizens in our diverse global village. It was surprising for the author of this blog to find that most of the 9 / 11 bombers were Saudi as the widely held expectation and perception at the time of 9 / 11 was the perpetrators of the airline crashes in in the Eastern U.S. were arabic palestinians as radical islamists. Many of the Saudis are devout islamists themselves and would never raise a hand against anyone as it is written in their scriptures that such actions are unlawful according to Mohammed and invite severe punishment(s.) The Saudis are by and large very educated and cultured people, and they are sophisticated enough to know what is going on in the world, especially those running their country. The present author, with this in mind, presents the point of view, to islamists as radicals and reformers alike, that there was born midway in the last century a generation in most Arab countries that came of age belying the reputations and moral high ground of their parents - they stood as if on the shoulders of their own giants at a very young and intrinsically wealthy age, and it is obvious their parents did not believe this to be a redeeming or constructive thing to do. They sought to preserve their children as a result and sent them to the best schools to get the best training in order that they succeed on their merits as earned. Bin Laden and his colleagues, despite their great sums were with these young people who were crippled and stifled into being terrorists among others by the discipline and tasks and duties of being subject to the vagaries of radicals in school, the will of their responsible parent for a structured life in view of radical sympathies, and so forth, and what (at least in part) Francis Fukuyama put on the cover of his first well - known book "The End of History" as handed down to them by their elders. This is only part of the story as many of the adverbial characterisations and reasons even, the "why's," and so forth, are lost even to those of bin Laden's followers who were good diarists. A simple explanation of what this evil is or was about is in the critically acclaimed and controversial poetry of Baudelaire and Mallarme, writers that bin Laden read or undoubtedly knew of through his studies. There is an alternative and contributory explanation to these views that hinges on the role of Middle Eastern culture as dominated and governed by orthodox Mohammedan beliefs and the like, but this is beyond the scope of simple blog entries at this point.
People like me do not feel sorry that he is gone; no one like me who has family and friends who are in the world and threatened by blindly terrorist acts against the great powers aimed at crippling and even destroying our culture as we know it and us, ourselves, in addition to that has any remorse about what happened at that Islamabad base last weekend. It will be perhaps trying in the short run for U.S. / Pakistani relations that their domestic airspace and other civic attributes were used in an act of war to which the populace might not have been entirely committed, though more Pakistanis stood to die in the terror wars without this happening, with everybody taking their risks as they did, even our enemies. There is a simple story about Mohammed moving a mountain that everyone reading in English needs to review, not as a story of scripture, but as a story about how the radicals in the Middle East might now perceive their place among others at this point. It is a dangerous thought to wonder how these radicals, islamists, and fascists or marxist, or in between, might attempt to impress this tale on us now their great teacher and leader's life has ended.
THS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)